When meat doesn't matter: Female Guinea baboons do not prefer males who are better at acquiring or sharing meat
tags:
Meat is a rare and highly prized resource for wild Guinea baboons (Papio papio). Yet, contrary to long-standing assumptions based on human hunter–gatherer societies, a new study by the German Primate Center—Leibniz-Institute for Primate Research (DPZ) reveals that female Guinea baboons do not preferentially choose males who are more skilled at acquiring meat as their mates.
The research team, led by William J. O'Hearn (DPZ & University of Exeter, U.K.), also shows that female Guinea baboons are less dependent on their primary male for access to meat than previously thought after documenting the first-ever case of female-initiated prey capture. The results, published in the American Journal of Biological Anthropology, shed new light on the evolutionary origins of meat provisioning as a male quality signal in primates.
The practice of catching and sharing prey as a signal of male quality has deep evolutionary roots and relevance to the human evolutionary trajectory. In human hunter–gatherer societies, catching prey can signal a male's quality as a provider, and sharing the spoils of the hunt can broadcast that signal throughout the community.
Guinea baboons offer a valuable analogy to the evolution of human food-sharing practices through their parallel evolution with early human ancestors. Additionally, they exhibit multilevel social organization that parallels the nested social levels of human societies, in which the lowest level (baboon: unit; human: core family) consists of one primary male, one to several associated females and their offspring.
A previous DPZ study, also led by O'Hearn, revealed how Guinea baboons share meat within these social organizations: More frequent sharing occurs at the level of the closest social unit, akin to human hunter–gatherers' practice of first sharing hunted prey with their immediate family members. The current study investigated whether meat-acquisition success and consequent meat-sharing act as male quality signals in Guinea baboons, also resembling patterns found in human hunter–gatherer societies.
Female baboons are less dependent on their primary male than expected
To answer this question, researchers from the Cognitive Ethology Laboratory at the DPZ used observations made over nine years at the DPZ field station Simenti in Senegal. They combined annotated recordings of 109 specific meat-eating events with demographic and behavioral data from 465 individually identified baboons. In 11% of these events, the prey was caught by a female—the first-ever observations of this behavior for Guinea baboons—and 41% of the meat eaten by females originated from sources other than their primary male.
In the previous study on Guinea baboon meat-sharing, male baboons transferred up to 40% of their caught prey to the females in their unit. While these results suggested that female baboons may depend on their males for access to meat, the new findings reveal that this dependence is not as pronounced as previously assumed. Still, a large share of the meat female baboons accessed originated from their primary male.
No female preference for more skilled male prey catchers or meat sharers
Additionally, statistical models revealed no link between a male's frequency of meat acquisition or transfer and either the number of females in his unit or the length of female–male associations. "Despite what we predicted, we found no evidence that females preferred to join or remain longer in the units of males who acquired or shared meat more often. Instead, females seem to get a substantial portion of their meat from sources other than their unit male, including simply catching the prey themselves," says lead author O'Hearn.
The largest factor in male mating success instead was age, with animals in their early- to mid-prime ages having more associated females in their units than older males.
Other factors might influence female reproductive decisions
Taken together, the results suggest that prey capturing and meat transfers are unlikely to be behaviorally relevant signals of male quality in Guinea baboons. This could in part be explained by the relative infrequency of meat-eating events in the lives of wild baboons, which occur far less often than successful hunts among human hunter–gatherers. Instead, female reproductive decisions could be influenced by physical signals from male baboons, such as more strongly red-tinted patches on their butts.
Similar physical signals have been shown to signal male quality in other primates. Or females could focus on behavioral or social signals, such as a male's tendency to care for its offspring or its behavior toward other females in the unit.
"Guinea baboons provide a particularly interesting evolutionary comparison to humans, in which similar ecological conditions and social systems have resulted in differences in the importance of meat sharing to female partner choice. Where females have many options for sourcing meat, it need not be a factor when choosing a mate," says O'Hearn.
More information
William J O'Hearn et al, Meat Acquisition Skill and Male Reproductive Success in Guinea Baboons, American Journal of Biological Anthropology (2026). DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.70327
Who's behind this story?
BA art history, MA material culture. Former museum editor, paramedic, and transplant coordinator. Editing for Science X since 2021. Full profile →
PhD nano-engineering from Delft University. Published researcher and journal reviewer. Brings scientific insight to content standards. Full profile →
Citation: When meat doesn't matter: Female Guinea baboons do not prefer males who are better at acquiring or sharing meat (2026, August 10) retrieved 10 August 2026 from https://phys.org/news/2026-08-meat-doesnt-female-guinea-baboons.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.