The oceans near Australia may be the best places to fertilize for removing carbon dioxide
tags:
Deploying ocean iron fertilization—a strategy for carbon dioxide capture—in higher latitudes rather than near the equator could reduce environmental impacts while still achieving removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, according to a modeling study published in Nature. The findings offer insight into best practices for maximizing carbon dioxide removal while reducing potential ecological trade-offs typically associated with iron fertilization.
Current carbon emissions are projected to surpass the Paris Climate Agreement's limit of 2°C above preindustrial levels. Ocean iron fertilization—in which iron is added to surface water to stimulate phytoplankton growth for carbon dioxide removal—is a potential solution. However, the ecological impacts of this strategy, such as creating runaway algal blooms and depleting nutrients in the water, have been a limitation.
Jun Yu, Adam Martiny and colleagues used an ocean iron fertilization model to assess the climate benefits and ecological trade-offs of the approach. By analyzing more than six decades of fertilization data, they found that net carbon dioxide removal was up to 5.3 parts per million, which corresponds to a removal rate of 0.70 gigatons of carbon dioxide per year.
Furthermore, Yu and colleagues found that the most productive areas—that is, the areas with the largest plankton blooms—after iron fertilization were the Southern Ocean and the equatorial Pacific. A key ecological issue with the strategy involves the depletion of macronutrients from the water column, particularly in areas near the tropical Pacific, which can propagate through the food chain and result in declines in macrozooplankton biomass.
However, the authors determined that these disturbances posed less risk when fertilization was deployed in higher latitudes. Specifically, they note that fertilizing 0.35% of the ocean in the equatorial Pacific leads to a minimum decline of 10% in macrozooplankton biomass, while fertilizing 0.2% of the Southern Ocean led to a 10% increase in macrozooplankton.
The authors suggest that fertilizing the Southern Ocean offers the best balance between ecological disturbance and carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere. However, they caution that ocean iron fertilization has downstream effects and that any localized interventions will inherently have nonlocal effects.
Publication details
Jun Yu et al, Climate benefit and ecological cost trade-offs for ocean iron fertilization, Nature (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-10795-y
Provided by University of California
Who's behind this story?
BA art history, MA material culture. Former museum editor, paramedic, and transplant coordinator. Editing for Science X since 2021. Full profile →
Bachelor's in mathematical biology, Master's in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language. Full profile →
Citation: The oceans near Australia may be the best places to fertilize for removing carbon dioxide (2026, July 29) retrieved 29 July 2026 from https://phys.org/news/2026-07-oceans-australia-fertilize-carbon-dioxide.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.