gshc2020.com

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would have allowed adults with fewer than six months to live to apply to be given help to end their own life, subject to certain safeguards.

A similar bill in the last parliamentary session was supported by MPs before stalling in the House of Lords. The decision from MPs on Friday rules out the prospect of changes to the law on assisted dying in the short-term.

The bill tabled by Labour MP Lauren Edwards will make no further progress, although MPs and peers could make another attempt in the next parliamentary session.

Assisted dying is an issue that has been debated for hundreds of hours in Parliament over the last two years and would have represented one of the biggest societal changes in recent years if it had been approved.

MPs were given a free vote, meaning they did not vote on party lines.

Safeguards within the bill included a requirement that a person applying for an assisted death had the approval of two doctors and an expert panel.

But critics said it included too few measures to protect vulnerable people from being coerced into ending their lives, while some say improving palliative care should be the priority.

Edwards, the Labour MP for Rochester and Strood, said: "Parliament has dropped the ball today.

"It will be picked up again as it must be, because the law as it stands is simply too cruel and too unjust to be allowed to stand."

Those in favour of a change in the law have said they would try to bring forward legislation again, with Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP who introduced the original bill, telling the BBC another attempt could come as soon as next year.

Labour MPs Ashley Dalton, Dame Meg Hillier and Jess Asato, who all opposed what they described the "unsafe and unworkable" bill, welcomed MPs' decision.

In a joint statement, they said: "This is not a moment for celebration, we understand the deep concerns of so many people across the country who have campaigned hard for a change in the law.

"But the truth is none of the relevant royal medical colleges, professional groups or experts will attest to the safety or workability of this bill."

They said there is a need to "fix our NHS and sort out social and palliative care before we even consider introducing assisted dying".

Sarah Wootton, chief executive of Dignity in Dying, said "thousands of terminally ill people will continue to suffer against their wishes in their last days and weeks".

She added she still believes "law change is inevitable".

Care Not Killing chief executive Gordon Macdonald described the vote as "decisive".

He said: "Our hope is that MPs now focus on repairing palliative care in the UK and securing the necessary funding to make sure that no matter what part of the country you live in, you can access the best possible care available and are treated with dignity and respect."

The bill in the last parliamentary session, brought forward by Leadbeater, cleared the House of Commons on 20 June 2025 with a majority of 23.

But it ran out of time to progress through all the necessary stages in Parliament after some peers in the House of Lords tabled more than 1,200 amendments.

Edwards brought forward the proposals again in a bid to ensure peers could "finish their job", although this will no longer take place.

During the debate, Labour MP Janet Daby was among those to confirm she would vote against the bill despite previously supporting it.

She told the Commons she had "nightmares about dying and death" after voting in favour of the last bill, adding: "I had to wrestle with myself, knowing that I was not entirely comfortable with the decision I had made, and my conscience was not at peace, and I cannot again, in good conscience, vote for the bill."