Is that the time? Why messaging matters with crises on the horizon
tags:
Framing environmental risks in terms of how much time is left, rather than a future date, makes them feel more urgent and increases public engagement.
When scientists, policymakers and journalists communicate environmental threats, they often rely on future dates: "water shortages by 2046" or "biodiversity loss by 2060."
But new research from King's Business School suggests that a simple shift in wording can make these threats feel more immediate and harder to dismiss.
The paper, published in the Journal of Consumer Research, examined how "date" framing, such as "water shortages by 2046," compares with "time-left" framing, such as "water shortages within 20 years."
Analyzing climate coverage at scale and testing responses in large studies, the researchers found that messages focused on how much time remains make environmental threats feel closer and more urgent, driving higher engagement and support for action.
The researchers found that time-left framing creates a feeling that time is "counting down" toward the threat. Rather than focusing attention on a distant calendar year, it highlights the shrinking amount of time available before the threat materializes.
The findings suggest that organizations communicating about climate risks—including researchers, policymakers and the media—could increase public engagement by shifting away from abstract future dates and toward clearer signals of how little time remains.
"Much of the public conversation about climate risk is organized around dates and deadlines. We show that framing threats around how much time is left creates a stronger sense of urgency. That helps explain why some headlines, briefings and campaigns prompt engagement while others struggle to cut through," said Dr. Ozlem Tetik, lecturer in marketing at King's Business School and co-author of the study.
Publication details
Ozlem Tetik et al, The Final Countdown: Temporal Frames of Environmental Threats, Journal of Consumer Research (2026). DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucag018
Who's behind this story?
Swati Mestri holds a bachelor's degree in Electronics Engineering and has worked as a content editor since 2019. She has experience editing research documents across technology, health care, and materials science, and has a particular interest in technology and space. Full profile →
Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success. Full profile →
Citation: Is that the time? Why messaging matters with crises on the horizon (2026, July 17) retrieved 17 July 2026 from https://phys.org/news/2026-07-messaging-crises-horizon.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.